fbpx

The importance of trailing leg follow-through

Depicted below multiple aggressors actions on including enemy mimicking the combatant’s skills

Figure A missed target stamp kick. Figure B left behind trailing leg. Figure C secondary aggressor mimicking the stamp kick.

CQC offensive and counter offensive actions must always include simultaneous trailing leg follow through for commitment and safety.

This is essential to ensure the trailing leg is not left behind in a compromised status.

If the trailing leg is left behind you will not only expose it to possible targeting but will also reduce expedient mobility capabilities.

Stamp kicking skills are not common outside of military self-defence and military close quarters combat and their purpose is knee joint and knee cap ligaments destruction to cause incapacitation.

In an actions on encounter where you are dominating your enemy, there is always the likelihood that they may mimic your skills.

If you fail to achieve your objective in the execution of a stamp kick and in your enemy eyes they consider that you were in fact trying to break their leg, then there is a possibility they could mimic your stamp kicking action.

The reasoning for this is usually they psychologically believe your skills are superior and would provide them with a better chance of defeating you.

This being the case if you left your trailing leg behind and ended in an overstretched stance you could effectively be cast and vulnerable to your enemy mimicking your stamp kick actions and targeting your exposed outstretched and possibly partially or fully hyperextended trailing leg.

In a multiple aggressor actions on leaving your trailing leg behind increases the risk of it being targeted by considerable and is in contradiction of our mill CQC tradecraft practices in regards to neutralising multiple enemy aggressors.

Your human senses under multiple aggressors actions on may well be focused on another enemy aggressor, leaving your trailing leg vulnerable from your rear or side flanks.

Whether you are employing long-range unarmed offensive assault stamp kicking or close range unarmed offensive assault striking, every skill should be directed through the target and the trailing leg must be replaced with every entry step taken.

Under unarmed offensive assault strategies a common error is that on final entry footwork the trailing leg is left behind and this should never be the case.

Even in combat sports where one competitor is being overwhelmed by another the likelihood of mimicking the superior opponent’s techniques is a reality.

I have seen this cost fighters in combat sports a win simply because they have in an instant through pressure and the effects of contact, discarded their trained primary techniques and opted to mimic their opponent’s techniques that they are not skilled in executing.

You should always stick to your primary methods of threat neutralisation and always execute them in full in a fluid committed action right through the target.

You must initiate your action from inside the primary execution range off of the squat crouch with proper CQC respiration tracking forward with commitment.

This will maximise not only your chances of objective achievement but also increase safety.

Article written by Tank Todd

Special Operations CQB Master Chief Instructor. Over 30 years experience. The only instructor qualified descendent of Baldock, Nelson, and Applegate. Former instructors include Harry Baldock (unarmed combat instructor NZ Army WWII), Colonel Rex Applegate OSS WWII and Charles Nelson, US Marine Corps. Tank has passed his Special Forces combative instructor qualification course in Southeast Asia and is certified to instruct the Applegate, Baldock and Nelson systems. His school has been operating for over eighty years and he is currently an Army Special Operations Group CQB Master Chief Instructor. His lineage and qualifications from the evolutionary pioneers are equalled by no other military close combat instructor. His operation includes his New Zealand headquarters, and 30 depots worldwide as well as contracts to train the military elite, security forces, and close protection specialists. Annually he trains thousands of exponents and serious operators that travel down-under to learn from the direct descendant of the experts and pioneers of military close combat. Following in the footsteps of his former seniors, he has developed weapons, and training equipment exclusive to close combat and tactical applications. He has published military manuals and several civilian manuals and produced DVDs on urban self protection, tactical control and restraint, and close combat. He has racked up an impressive 100,000+ hours in close combat.