fbpx

Females counter sexual violence best chances of incapacitating their attacker facts

To effectively confirm physical skills that will give a female the best chances of stopping sexual violence and incapacitating a violent offender requires practical smarts a realist mentality and dispersing with any prior preferences of training and styles that are not the safest, most proven and effective means of threat neutralisation.

The reality is sexual violence like street violence and domestic violence are not traditional practices are not based on traditional styles with an ethos of respect and fair play.

You must open your mind to the harsh realities of predatory sexual offenders and their modus operandi.

Males and Females disparities in physical strength can be between 40% and 60% and then if the male is dramatically bigger and in good physical shape the disparity could be considerably greater hence the need for skills to neutralise such attackers in sexual violent assaults requirements to be based on human anatomy destruction and not take on fight techniques that are contested in gender age and weight categories in competition.

While sexual attackers may not be skilled in traditional fighting arts or martial arts their brutally effective methods will give them the greatest advantages of overpowering and overwhelming their victim.

They do not want to get arrested for their crime or be left with and scratches scrapes bite marks or leave any evidence of their identity and this makes them extremely dangerous and difficult to counter attack.

They will use means and methods that would never be allowed in sparring or competition and there will be no weight divisions gender categories rules regulations officials or anyone to come to the aid of the victim.

They are likely to use the element of surprise shock action and their superior physical attributes and physical capability.

The environment dark of night secluded location and not only the psychological effects of such a terrifying threat but also the ferocity and hard heavy contact are very different to a studio training environment.

I can remember a former elite forces soldier friend of mine that instructed urban self-defence training after getting out of the military telling me of a female self-defence instructor that promoted herself as fearless of men and able to defeat them in a self-defence situation applying for one of his realistic training exercises course.

During urban environmental awareness training in the dark of night designed to test attendee’s skills capabilities and levels of mental toughness under urban night sky realities she was too afraid to even enter the dark alley that was part of inoculation against such an environment. When she final did and was confronted by male enemy party she was helpless and unable to do anything.

Talking the talk is easy stupidity for whatever reason but walking the walk where there no rules safe guards or out options and when you have no prior warning of the violent attacker waiting to pounce is very different.

The facts of the matter are training including scenario training and the skills the understudies are armed with need to be the best means of threat neutralisation and the individual trainees need to be

The reality is the underdog must be strong willed and mentally prepared to face violent threat by means of deliberate man stopping tactics and skills specific to neutralising threats of sexual violence. This is good reasoning why such sensitive subject needs highly trained expert instructors that are qualified in the best of battlefield and urban jungle man stopping skills.

Properly preparing female trainees for the physical and mental disparities between a smaller female and a gaol driven much bigger and stronger violent male sexual offender is the instructor’s duty and they must have a duty of care to provide the most effective proven tactics and skills to the vulnerable.

They may not have training in how the human mind works but they will be well aware that their considerably smaller, less physically capable female victim when overpowered and aggressively controlled and contained can quickly develop a defeatist mentality and submit to the actions and objectives of their aggressor.

Fear and pain can quickly bring on helplessness and hopelessness. If the target victim has not undergone training in how to enhance mental toughness in regards to facing and dealing with physical violence and has been trained in the very best of dirty fowl man stopper skills.

While instructors might have good intentions training their understudies in traditional arts or competitive codes based self-defence methods or hybridised methods for self-defence, the reality is up against a considerably physically superior male criminal aggressor that has no respect for fellow humans, the need is the very best of foul means of man stopper skills.

Trying to throw a physically superior violent aggressor equates to self-defence suicide.

Trying to fight a violent criminal sexual predator with take on fight skills has a high chance of failure.

The reality is the predatory sexual offender will pick the time and place and ensure their victim has no-one to come to their aid.

They will also use skills that eliminate their victim’s ability to employ fight skills while ensuring they reduce any risk to themselves by controlling and containing their victim with overwhelming strength.

The assault will be hard and fast, including rough lifting, carrying or dragging as part of abduction or they may invade the victim’s home in the execution of their sexual violence crime. They will have planned to commit the sexual assault and will arm themselves for the tools they need to contain and silence their victim to achieve their objective. They may physically beat their victim into submission.

They may not need to gag their victim if they have terrified them to the point of giving in and giving up.

Those that are knowledgeable in the realities of violent sexual offending including serial offending will be well aware that the dangerous deranged violent sexual offender will do everything to ensure they are not prevented achieving their objective or arrested.

They may well see screaming for help activating a personal alarm or trying to fight them as trying to injure them and get them arrested.

Serious predatory sexual offenders including serial offenders may well resort to murder to eliminate being captured by eliminating the only witness that could identify them.

If a victim was identified as trying to get DNA from their violent sexual attacker this could end in a homicide.

Dead witnesses don’t give evidence in a murder trial is a sad but possible outcome of a failed fight back, helpless attempt at raising the alarm or being caught trying to gather evidence by a dangers sexual offender.

This is threat assessment and best of safe and effective decision making is a must.

Just like a soldier on the battlefield where its incapacitate or eliminate the enemy by the most brutal battle proven ruthless foul means, in a violent sexual assault such a mentality and very threat neutralisation specific tactics and skills are required.

There are no rules respect for the enemies safety and they must be dispatched by the best of battle proven dirty tricks brigade means and methods in a life or death actions on military battle field close quarters combat encounter with the trained soldier doing everything to ensure victory over defeat.

This means taking the enemy out and never a mind-set of taking them on.

Such objective achievement modus operandi requires a practical realist determined mind-set that includes both primary tactics and skills required to neutralise a formidable foe.

Combative military self-defence mental toughness enhancement training is the most important component of self-protection training for without it the victim is practically helpless.

The Todd Group mental toughness program has been developed by leading mil self-defence and close quarters combat master-instructors and is specific for real life high risk dangerous actions on threat neutralisation.

The foul dirty tricks must provide the best chances of incapacitating a considerably larger and stronger goal driven violent sexual offender by deliberate calculated controlled aggressive means.

Anything less is simply not best preparing the underdog through best tactics and best of threat neutralisation proven skills training to neutralise their violent attacker.

Confidence and personal capability is increased when they know and believe they are armed with skills that can neutralise any over dog violent aggressor.

Knowledge is power and primary practice training in the best means of stopping a violent sexual offender over merely surviving being sexually violated is what threat neutralisation must be about.

Military unarmed combat and military self-defence highly trained and qualified instructors that are responsible for the doctrine and the development of skills and training packages are tradecraft experts in the field of the most effective safe means of threat neutralisation. This is far removed and has a very different objective from Hobby or sport traditional or competitive styles or codes training and competing.

The principles of military self-defence and military close quarters combat provide tactical anti-encounter options through early threat recognition and avoidance or threat specific conflict resolution and de-escalation.

If there is no out option available to the target of a sexual violation threat then the under-dog must put a quick and as safe as humanly possible end to the violent sexual aggressor. The difference between being a victim of sexual violence and stopping a violent sexual attacker in their tracks is the best primary skills and intestinal fortitude to do what would normally be considered unthinkable and inhumane.

The target of sexual violence will have to with confidence and commitment deliver man stopping harm stepping outside their normal human mentality for that moment in time if they want to put an end to their violent sexual offender. They will have to use the tactics they have been instructed in to keep them safe and set up their ruthless means of threat neutralisation.

It comes down to experts in the field of human anatomy destruction, providing best chances tactics and skills to put an end to the violent sexual offenders capabilities to achieve his objective of sexually violating them, and this is not part of sparring playing or competing where there are rules referee’s judges safeguards and a safe environment.

Individuals that instruct anything less than the best, most proven and safest means of threat neutralisation, whether it be with good intentions or out of a lack of proven knowledge expertise and qualifications in the best threat specific methods required to neutralise such a dire and dangerous threat, need to take a good look at what they are delivering and think long and hard about the facts of the matter of an underdog facing and over dog being able to safely and effectively win and not merely survive with the teachings they are providing.

Subject matter expert instructors will deliver training by best professional practices to ensure those under their care and instruction are armed with the tactics and skills to keep them safe and make them as effective under threat as possible.

Those with the smarts experience and expertise always consider the over dog to be bigger stronger, fitter, faster, highly skilled and bent on causing them serious bodily harm or worse.

They have considerable knowledge of the modus operandi of wide ranging violence including the battlefield and urban concrete jungles, sexual violence and domestic violence.

They have been trained tested and qualified and racked up long instructing records of service instructing formidable enemy stopping threat neutralisation skills.

The ethos and intention is always to arm understudies with the best of battle proven means and methods of threat neutralisation inside the laws of self-defence or for the battlefield inside the rules of engagement.

Being a fighter or traditional or competitive code instructor doesn’t make anyone an expert in knowledge and know how in the best and safest means of formidable aggressor incapacitation.

The military master instructor has the background qualifications certification and experience in their trade-craft including skills development required for objective achievement threat neutralisation.

They know how to problem solve and adapt primary mil self-defence based skills to fit the threat neutralisation role and requirements or develop situational and threat specific skills.

They have proven themselves as exponents of mil self-defence and CQC on courses and under the most realistic testing and over decades have achieved proponent and instructor rank committing thousands of hours to their tradecraft.

They have learnt how to instruct and conduct specialist training and how to best arm their exponents and candidates with best of proven means and methods of threat neutralisation.

Serious consideration when it comes to your self-protection must include identifying if the instructor is qualified in the tactics and skills specific to threat neutralisation requirements of the threat type.

Such expertise and credentials are not gained in days or weeks through training in a sporting or hobby traditional hybridised style.

You would not want to be armed with just traditional fighting arts or competitive styles techniques at war on the battlefield and the same applies to facing violent sexual criminals.

Having male enemy training party on counter sexual violence courses is most important so female exponents can experience physical build body strength and male type differences not only in physical attributes and physicality but how they conduct themselves in the training scenarios with their actions based on how they would go about seizing securing controlling containing and abducting their female training partner under controlled but most realistic training.

The realities in physical strength differences between males and females can be considerable with average upper and lower body strength being between 50% and 70% lesser for females.

Then if the male is much larger this can increase the physical size and strength disparity by even more.

Having female exponents attend with their own male training partner has always been a best practice for confidence and competency achievement under our D-WAR declare war against rape training regime.

There is no reason why females attending such important life skills self-protection courses should not bring their own male training partner with them.

Not only is it a best practice for confidence and competency enhancement but it identifies if any instructor is providing training in techniques that simply have no chance of working against a bigger stronger savvy male training partner.

How many females have attended female only allowed self-defence courses to go home and try the techniques with their husband father brother or male friends and find out they are helpless and the techniques are useless.

The best and correct tools are required delivered by highly trained and qualified dirty tricks brigade trade-craft specialist subject matter expert instructors.

The very objective and modus operandi of military self-defence and close quarters combat is to upskill combatants with the best of battle proven foul dirty means of neutralising a dangerous enemy.

Sexual violence courses based on such best of battle proven military self-defence skills give the underdog the best combative chances of neutralising a dangerous over-dog and that is as close to guaranteed as it gets when the odds are stacked so heavily against the targeted under-dog of serious sexual violence.

Article written by Tank Todd

Special Operations CQB Master Chief Instructor. Over 30 years experience. The only instructor qualified descendent of Baldock, Nelson, and Applegate. Former instructors include Harry Baldock (unarmed combat instructor NZ Army WWII), Colonel Rex Applegate OSS WWII and Charles Nelson, US Marine Corps. Tank has passed his Special Forces combative instructor qualification course in Southeast Asia and is certified to instruct the Applegate, Baldock and Nelson systems. His school has been operating for over eighty years and he is currently an Army Special Operations Group CQB Master Chief Instructor. His lineage and qualifications from the evolutionary pioneers are equalled by no other military close combat instructor. His operation includes his New Zealand headquarters, and 30 depots worldwide as well as contracts to train the military elite, security forces, and close protection specialists. Annually he trains thousands of exponents and serious operators that travel down-under to learn from the direct descendant of the experts and pioneers of military close combat. Following in the footsteps of his former seniors, he has developed weapons, and training equipment exclusive to close combat and tactical applications. He has published military manuals and several civilian manuals and produced DVDs on urban self protection, tactical control and restraint, and close combat. He has racked up an impressive 100,000+ hours in close combat.